Which of the following is NOT a requirement for demonstrating a public nuisance?

In the context of public nuisance law, an essential aspect is that the act must impact a significant number of people or a class of individuals, indicating a broader societal impact rather than a private wrong. The requirement that the act or omission occurs only once does not align with the established principles of public nuisance. Public nuisances typically involve ongoing or repeated actions that consistently infringe upon the rights or well-being of the public or a community.

Demonstrating a public nuisance involves showing that the interference is material and foreseeable, indicating that the harm being caused is significant enough to warrant consideration as a nuisance. Additionally, awareness of the nuisance by the affected class can be relevant, as it helps establish the nuisance's impact and significance in the community. However, the idea that the act must occur only once contradicts the underlying theory of public nuisance, which is addressed through continuous or recurrent harmful behaviors.