How does the balance of convenience factor into injunctions related to nuisance?

In injunctions related to nuisance, the balance of convenience is crucial as it requires the court to assess the impact of an injunction on both parties involved. This means the court will take into consideration how the proposed injunction would affect not only the individual or entity affected by the nuisance but also the party causing the alleged nuisance. This balanced approach allows the court to evaluate the practical implications of granting or denying the injunction, ensuring that the resolution serves the greater good and does not cause undue hardship to either side.

For example, if an injunction would greatly benefit the claimant by stopping a nuisance, but would impose significant and perhaps irreversible harm on the defendant, the court must weigh these competing interests. The goal is to find a solution that minimizes harm while addressing the legal and social concerns at play. This nuanced assessment is pivotal, as simply siding with the claimant's desire to stop the nuisance without considering the broader implications could lead to unjust outcomes.